I have had the opportunity to visit a couple of classrooms at a private bilingual school in Morelia. The staff of 50 at this primaria/secundaria has only 3 native English speakers: the English director is a 30-year Mexican resident from San Francisco, the 5th grade English teacher was born in Mexico but raised in Chicago from age 4 to 17, and the 6th grade English teacher is a native of central New Jersey who came to Morelia to visit friends 20 years ago and never left.
The English Director explained that nearly all of their 9th graders take the Preliminary English Exam (PET) every year, an English proficiency exam published by Cambridge University in England. With very few exceptions, they all pass; half score in the advanced range.
Naturally, I had to check out what they are doing. I observed the 5th and 6th grade English classes (taught by the teachers mentioned above), each consisting of 22-25 students. Teachers are required to use an ESL program (“Backpack” by Pearson Education) that has extensive speaking, reading, and writing components as well as teaching other subjects in English. Both teachers were continuing a writing lesson from the previous day and assessing oral conversation with pairs of students. I must say I witnessed some excellent teaching and took extensive notes.
I couldn’t help but compare these students to students of Mexican immigrants in Richmond. In general, the bilingual students in Morelia struggled with speaking English, but they understood academic English and were able to read and write almost as well as they could in their native language. In Richmond, students understand and speak conversational English, but they struggle with communicating at higher, more academic levels. (The large Latino community in Richmond is also somewhat isolated from the dominant society in the US, so their exposure to English, especially accademic English, is not as great as one might think despite the fact that most students were born and raised in California.) Richmond students also struggle with reading and writing in both languages.
Certainly, I’m comparing oranges and manzanas (apples). The students of the private school in Morelia are of middle class families whose parents are educated and have the resources to send their children to private schools. Most of the Mexican immigrant families in Richmond come from small rural communities with very few resources and have received little formal education.
But the point is this: after spending five or six years of 2 and a half hours of instruction in English mostly by teachers who are not native English speakers, Mexican students in the Morelia bilingual program read and write better in English and Spanish than students of Mexican immigrants in Richmond. It is worth investigating whether having a solid, continuous foundation in a primary language makes it easier to acquire a second language.
My observations are consistent with research (see A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students' Long-Term Academic Achievement, by Thomas and Collier, 2002) that indicates that students in dual-immersion programs – which have biliteracy as their ultimate goal – have greater academic achievement than monolingual students and even students in other bilingual programs (such as transitional programs) by the end of high school. If this is the case, then one must wonder why schools in West Contra Costa USD (Richmond) are moving in the opposite direction.